Critérios de monitoramento de riscos nas contratações como contribuição para a governança em instituições públicas: uma análise na UFPA

Abstract

The public administration has an essential role at the economic and social development of a country and the administrative contracts has a fundamental importance for the effective working of public administration. However, without an effective risk management in these contracts, with a continuous monitoring of these risks, the possibility of a low quality in the services and the contracting institution governance be affected, is imminent. Therefore, It is necessary a risk management instrument, that contributes for the institution good governance. In this sense, the problem that needs to be researched was: what criteria should be observed in a risk monitoring instrument in the contracting carried out by UFPA, in order to improve governance in this institution and that could serve as a model for other public agencies? The studies general objective was to analyze the criteria for the formulation of a monitoring instrument focused to strength the risk management in the public contracts, in order to contribute for the governance, in the subject organization. To achieve this objective, a research with predominantly qualitative approach, exploratory and descriptive character was developed. Regarding the types of procedures used, the dissertation used a study based essentially on a documentary and bibliographical analysis. The research is inserted in the risk management politics and guide lines structure context of Federal University of Pará, boarding specifically the risk management process in the acquisitions, stem from the Judgment TCU nº 1.679/2015 – Plenary and Joint Normative Instruction 01/2016 MP/CGU, besides the risk management politics of UFPA, describing the administrative contracts situation, in the period from 2016 to 2018, about the risk management. The research result demonstrated the set of criteria and actions that were considered necessary so that they can be included in an effective risk monitoring instrument that could contribute to the good governance of the institution, besides serving as a model for other public institutions.